|
Catalyst Group: The Path Forward
|
||||||||
Reaching out to Catalyst
|
Once it seems clear that Catalyst might be helpful to you or your organization, the process forward is a fairly simple and flexible one. Requests for additional information, business development opportunities, such as acquisitions and other potential transactions, non-disclosure agreements, financial disclosures, offering memoranda, or possible joint venture relationships should be directed first to our Vice President of Business Development:
Lenders, potential equity partners and other inquiries related to terms, structure and other areas of concern to the Mergers and Acquisitions arm of the firm should be directed to our Senior Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions:
General inquiries, mailings, express packages and couriers should be directed to:
|
|||||||
Initial Disclosures
|
Though it seems self-evident, we are constantly surprised at the number of submissions we
receive without the most basic data required to make an initial evaluation. At the risk of redundancy, we outline
below the details we look for when evaluating a prospective investment. The more information we have about a
prospect the better able we are to evaluate the risk in a potential transaction and the more confident we can be
in our ability to add value. Accordingly, we prefer a certain minimum of initial disclosure. At a
minimum we look for:
Of course, the more detail we are given the better. Accordingly we give some preference to opportunities where additional information is available. Along these lines we prefer to see: Five (5) years each of historical, quarterly and audited, financial statements composed of at least: We regularly give priority in our evaluations to opportunities that err on the side of disclosure
over those with more limited detail.
|
|||||||
|
Going Forward |
After an initial screening by our Business
Development Group, interesting opportunities are passed on to our Mergers and Acquisitions Group for analysis.
If we continue to be interested we generally contact the seller or seller's representative to arrange for an initial, and very preliminary, discussion between our Mergers and Acquisition's group and representatives from the seller's management team. In this, our approach is somewhat different to traditional private equity firms. By putting an early focus on cursory discussions with the seller's management we avoid becoming involved in transactions where our particular strengths and interests are not useful or compelling in the transaction. We also find that this approach, management discussions first, helps us avoid wasting time on transactions that are being created "on-the-fly" by third parties, as opposed to deals where management has already committed to a definitive disposition of some kind for the entity. If our Mergers and Acquisitions Group believes the deal meets our criteria it is presented to the partnership at our weekly partner meeting. If our Mergers and Acquisitions Group can convince our Partners that a viable and interesting deal exists, things begin to move very quickly. At this point we generally issue a non-binding "Expression of Continued Interest" and begin the process of conducting detailed due diligence before formulating our initial structural proposal for a transaction. Throughout the process we try to tread lightly, understand the needs and desires of the
various stakeholders in the process and, above all, always take the high road. |
|||||||
Discretion and Confidentiality
|
We recognize that transactions do not always take place against
ideal backdrops. Issues with employees, partners, suppliers, shareholders and a variety of other stakeholders may make
the mere mention of a transaction a very sensitive issue. For this reason we hold confidentiality very dear. Though
conducting due diligence is important to us, we take great pains to structure our inquiries in gentle and unobtrusive
ways.
Working closely with the seller's representatives we craft a detailed set of criteria to avoid inadvertent disclosures or triggering the ever busy rumor mill. No one enjoys the often cloak-and-daggeresque measures required to avoid turning a working environment corrosive, but we do take a certain pride in being able to keep the process "under wraps." Post-transaction, many sellers are not anxious to publicize the details (or even existence) of the sale. Accordingly, we have a strict policy of not commenting on acquisitions unless expressly requested to by the seller. We do not press "tombstones," or placard our walls with the trappings of hostile takeovers. We rely, instead, on sellers and, occasionally, the employees of our portfolio companies to sing our praises. Often, however, we find the seller proud to announce our affiliation as a "white knight"
purchaser of units that might otherwise have been closed. In these cases we work carefully with the seller to craft
a suitable set of criteria our professionals use to guide our discussions with respect to the transaction. We view
it as our job to make a seller look good. It's a measure of our success that 33% of firm's we have made purchases
from have returned to us to explore other divestiture opportunities. |
|||||||